《道德经》《美国宪法》：隐私权与内斗

《道德经》 提到隐私多次。1，27，72.

”道可道，非常道。名可名，非常名。“
http://taolaw.blogspot.com/2017/04/meets-us-constitution-preamble.html

“善行，无辙迹①；善言②，无瑕谪③；。。。善闭，无关楗而不可开⑥；善结，无绳约而不可解”
http://taolaw.blogspot.com/2017/04/ddj-27.html

”民不畏威①，则大威至②。无狎③其所居，无厌④其所生。夫唯不厌⑤，是以不厌。“
http://taolaw.blogspot.com/2017/05/ddj-72-disappearing-civil-jury-trial.html


《美国宪法》也相应有几次提及隐私权, 虽然没有明说。  修正案：1，3，4，5
http://taolaw.blogspot.com/2017/05/ddj-66.html
AMENDMENT I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the 

Government for a redress of grievances.

http://taolaw.blogspot.com/2017/05/ddj-68.html

US Constitution. AMENDMENT III.
No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.

http://taolaw.blogspot.com/2017/05/ddj-69.html

AMENDMENT IV

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

http://taolaw.blogspot.com/2017/05/ddj-70.html

AMENDMENT V

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊隐私与内斗的关系＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊

JY 说起“平等”才能不内斗。 “同人卦”。 问《道德经》有什么说法。

《道德经》基本上没有直说《内斗 vs 外斗》 但是这个题目是隐题（Hidden Theme）。就是老子似乎所有的理念都围绕着”如何选择价值观，因此减少内斗“。  “天下皆知美之为美，恶已①；皆知善，斯不善矣②。。。 不上贤①，使民不争；不贵难得之货②，使民不为盗③；不见可欲④，使民不乱。是以圣人之治也，虚其心⑤，实其腹，弱其志⑥，强其骨，恒使民无知、无欲也。”  

价值观要是定错了。 推广崇拜以下价值：钱，权，名，欲，排名第一，上进，人上人，利用其他人的信任，窥探其他人的隐私并利用。 那么“平等”不内斗是不可能的，内斗也是不可避免的。http://taolaw.blogspot.com/2017/04/blog-post_14.html

六月底有三篇博客，连着说内斗的危害。  
http://taolaw.blogspot.com/2017/06/blog-post_28.html
http://taolaw.blogspot.com/2017/06/blog-post_29.html
http://taolaw.blogspot.com/2017/06/blog-post_30.html

智慧出，有大伪－最牛2000年预测
http://taolaw.blogspot.com/2017/08/blog-post_11.html