社区的力量大多数外人看不见也不应该看见。 可惜华人自己也看不见，所以不愿意做基础社区工作。 假设早点多培育几百个华人律师，我们就去告大学。有诉讼的，这种请愿可以帮我们加大PR的效果。 比如Dr Tao 诉讼UA。
没有诉讼，没有培育华人律师，光有公关白宫请愿。 像神人打仗，同时遛狗。没有炮兵飞机掩护，人也暴露了，狗也死了。
JY 关于反大学AA，提出两个问题。 我觉得这些问题非常key。
1）真的这么实行不分族裔，好大学里面几乎清一色亚裔，是否有后遗症?是否有更合适，更对华裔整体长期有利的立场及方案?
2）印度裔管族裔不族裔，照样在各个领域有拔尖表现，他们做了什么华人该学习的事?
这些问题希望华人多想想。
中国：
九寨沟地震。 旅游者千人生死未知。 祝平安。
政治：床铺政策，共和党政见的文（Venn）图。
摩门教领袖，管摩门教历史，被驱逐出教：
Workplace Free-speech-legal issue of the day:
https://www.blog.google/topics/diversity/note-employees-ceo-sundar-pichai/
“First, let me say that we strongly support the right of Googlers to express themselves, and much of what was in that memo is fair to debate, regardless of whether a vast majority of Googlers disagree with it. However, portions of the memo violate our Code of Conduct and cross the line by advancing harmful gender stereotypes in our workplace. Our job is to build great products for users that make a difference in their lives. ”
So，Mr Damore, we "strongly support" your free expression. blah blah blah blah. We encourage an environment in which people can express yourself. blah blah blah. blah blah blah. But you are fired.
Quote from Foxnews: The National Labor Relations Act protects employees who are trying to organize unions, but there is a clause stating employees are allowed to engage in activities for “other mutual aid or protection.”
The NLRA clause could allow Damore to argue that he was “organizing for mutual aid not to be discriminated against as a man,” says Rossein.
A lot would depend on the timeline of what happened, but any complaint that he filed would not have been processed yet by the National Labor Relations Board.
“If he could prove he was fired at least in part for filing a charge, he could prevail,” said Rossein, nothing that whether Damore actually has a claim under the NLRA is unclear. “If he made a complaint and he could prove he was fired for that charge – he has to prove Google was aware that he was filing this charge.”
In other words, Damore would have to somehow prove he was fired specifically for his NLRB complaint and not for the memo itself.
Even if the software engineer had penned his memo and posted it on his own blog or social media account, Rossein said he could still face retaliation from his employer.
http://www.foxnews.com/tech/2017/08/08/fired-google-employee-who-wrote-anti-diversity-memo-threatens-to-sue-legal-expert-says-doesnt-have-case.html
The NLRA clause could allow Damore to argue that he was “organizing for mutual aid not to be discriminated against as a man,” says Rossein.
A lot would depend on the timeline of what happened, but any complaint that he filed would not have been processed yet by the National Labor Relations Board.
“If he could prove he was fired at least in part for filing a charge, he could prevail,” said Rossein, nothing that whether Damore actually has a claim under the NLRA is unclear. “If he made a complaint and he could prove he was fired for that charge – he has to prove Google was aware that he was filing this charge.”
In other words, Damore would have to somehow prove he was fired specifically for his NLRB complaint and not for the memo itself.
Even if the software engineer had penned his memo and posted it on his own blog or social media account, Rossein said he could still face retaliation from his employer.
http://www.foxnews.com/tech/2017/08/08/fired-google-employee-who-wrote-anti-diversity-memo-threatens-to-sue-legal-expert-says-doesnt-have-case.html
http://www.foxnews.com/tech/2017/08/08/fired-google-employee-who-wrote-anti-diversity-memo-threatens-to-sue-legal-expert-says-doesnt-have-case.htmlhttp://www.foxnews.com/tech/2017/08/08/fired-google-employee-who-wrote-anti-diversity-memo-threatens-to-sue-legal-expert-says-doesnt-have-case.html
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.